I realize the technical question about this has been recently answered. My question is a bit different.
Can someone explain (a) how this bug came to be; (b) why is has not been fixed yet; (c) why it was not fixed instantly upon the first report.
I ask because this bug makes it impossible for a substantial fraction of published papers in psychology and related fields to conform to APA guidelines, and thus invalidates one of Mendeley's main claims to be a serious bibliographic system.
A search for "(in press)" at google scholar gives 3,090,000 results! That is 3,090,000 papers that cannot be published with Mendeley.
Thanks. --David Lewis
↧